“We can’t trust Mike Rogers to stand up for us because he’s proven he won’t… It’s not something that working families can afford to have on our side.” – UAW Local 602 President Mike Huerta
LANSING — The Gander reported today that “state lawmakers, union leaders, and advocates for campaign finance reform” are speaking out and “warning” voters to “steer clear” of Mike Rogers who “is incapable of serving his constituents over special interests.”
Rogers has a “lengthy record of voting against campaign finance reforms that were designed to minimize corporate influence in politics.” After Rogers left Congress, he abandoned Michigan and made “tens of millions of dollars in various corporate board positions.”
In Congress, Rogers voted against many key pieces of campaign finance legislation, including the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, a House Resolution that sought to ban lawmakers from accepting gifts from lobbyists, and the DISCLOSE Act.
Rogers explained his opposition to campaign finance reform by suggesting that cracking down on money in politics would be ineffective because “it’s like the old saying about a prostitute. You’ll do it for a million or you’ll do it for a dollar—it still makes you a prostitute. It’s the same way with corruption.”
Read the Gander’s reporting on Michigan leaders “warning” voters to “steer clear” of Mike Rogers who is “is incapable of serving his constituents over special interests:”
The Gander: Michigan leaders say Mike Rogers represents ‘everything people hate’ about politics
- State Sen. Dayna Polehanki (D-Livonia) understands why some Michiganders may have lost faith in their elected officials’ ability to look out for their best interests—especially for those who had to deal with Republican US Rep. Mike Rogers in Congress for 14 years.
- “It’s disheartening to me that Michiganders are reporting that they’re losing faith in politicians. But Mike Rogers is a perfect example,” Polehanki said during a virtual press conference last week. “I am going to be voting for and supporting candidates for office, Democrats who we can trust, who are putting their constituents first and aren’t interested in enriching themselves by shady self-dealing, and aren’t engaged in just extreme hypocrisy that can’t be overlooked.”
- Polehanki, US Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Michigan), End Citizens United President Tiffany Muller, and Mike Huerta, the president of the United Auto Workers union Local 602 in Lansing, teamed up last week to shine a light on Rogers’ lengthy record of catering to special interests in Congress—and to warn Michiganders not to give him another chance to represent Michigan.
- “There’s a lot at stake for hardworking Michiganders in this year’s election and in the Senate race, Mike Rogers … has shown time and time again that he only cares about his own bottom line, even when his work is to just enrich himself at Michiganders expense,” Stevens said. “We’re going to make sure that [voters] know who Mike Rogers is—he is not for them.”
- Rogers served seven terms in Congress before announcing his retirement in 2014, moving to a mansion in Florida, and making tens of millions of dollars in various corporate board positions.
- But with Rogers’ lengthy record of voting against campaign finance reforms that were designed to minimize corporate influence in politics, Michigan leaders—like Huerta—contend that Rogers is incapable of serving his constituents over special interests.
- “We can’t trust Mike Rogers to stand up for us because he’s proven he won’t,” Huerta said. “So when we look at what he’s done when he was a representative, it’s exactly what he’ll do as a senator—and it’s not something that working families can afford to have on our side.”
- A review of Rogers’ stance on several key pieces of legislation during his time in Congress, helps to shed some light on how he might vote in the future, if he’s elected in November.
- In 2002, Rogers voted against the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, otherwise known as the McCain-Feingold Act, which regulated political spending and required candidates to “stand by” their advertisements—namely by throwing a tagline with their name at the end of commercials.
- Among other things, that legislation prohibited unlimited amounts of so-called “soft money” from being donated to national political parties and also limited campaign financing only to “hard money”—which are donations that are made directly to a candidate’s political campaign.
- When asked about why he opposed the legislation ahead of the vote, Rogers, at the time, explained to one reporter: “It’s like the old saying about a prostitute. You’ll do it for a million or you’ll do it for a dollar—it still makes you a prostitute. It’s the same way with corruption.”
- The legislation passed into law without Rogers’ support, and was billed as the most significant campaign finance law to be passed by federal lawmakers since at least 1974.
- In 2006, Rogers voted against a House Resolution that sought to ban lawmakers from accepting gifts from lobbyists, including travel expenses. It also sought to close (or at least slow down) the so-called “revolving door” of ex-lawmakers retiring from Congress to pursue often-lucrative careers as lobbyists by extending the lobbying ban on former legislators from one to two years.
- Later that summer, Rogers was reportedly spotted on the bow of a luxury yacht alongside lobbyists with the National Marine Manufacturers Association. The event—dubbed the “Congressional Cruise Series”—was billed, unabashedly, as a way for lobbyists to develop relationships with influential politicians, according to reports from the Chicago Tribune.
- A few years later, in 2010, Rogers voted against the DISCLOSE Act, which would’ve required groups who spend money on elections to disclose their largest donors—namely to help lift the veil on so-called “dark money” groups that hide their donors while trying to influence voters.
- That bill also included a requirement for campaigns to report their political expenditures within 24 hours—particularly for political expenditures of $10,000 or more that are made prior to 20 days before an election, and for expenditures of $1,000 or more within 20 days of an election.
- In 2011, Rogers voted against another piece of legislation that would’ve required presidential campaigns to disclose any contributions from foreign individuals, corporations, or countries—as well as any donor who spends more than $100,000 during the presidential election cycle.
- And in 2014, Rogers voted for legislation that would have effectively blocked the IRS from issuing proposed regulations designed to require more transparency in political spending.
- At the time, advocacy groups said the legislation only helped preserve a tax loophole created through Citizens United that allows corporations, associations, and the super rich to conceal multi-million dollar investments through the guise of so-called “social welfare” organizations.
- This week, Stevens and other leaders contended that Rogers’ voting record speaks for itself.
- “It’s important that you listen to voters and constituents and when you’re in that chamber, you vote with their best interests in mind. That’s just not what Mike Rogers will do. He’s out for himself. He’s not out for the voters, and he doesn’t care what they have to say,” Stevens said. “Our next senator should be someone who stands up for Michigan workers, fights for unions, and who puts the middle class at the forefront of their agenda. The stakes are very high.”
- Muller added: “We believe that elected officials should represent the people and not corporate special interest, not their personal bank accounts, and not their biggest donors. But Mike Rogers, that’s all he’s focused on representing. He’s focused on helping out his biggest donors at the expense of working Michiganders. And he represents everything that people hate about politics. … It’s clear that he cannot be trusted to do anything aside from padding his own bottom line.”
See also: Detroit News: Mike Rogers targets China in Senate campaign, but his own connections draw criticism, Business Insider: 9 years through the revolving door: How the GOP’s top Senate recruit in Michigan got rich after leaving Congress, Heartland Signal: Michigan GOP Senate candidate Mike Rogers connected to Saudi companies, including one with nuclear ambitions, Heartland Signal: Michigan Senate candidate spews anti-China rhetoric despite working to expand Chinese companies and personal wealth, American Journal News: Michigan Republican Mike Rogers has repeatedly dodged questions about his work at AT&T, American Journal News: Mike Rogers’ ties to Chinese telecom giants fuel hypocrisy scandal.
###
